Liberals have been screaming about the sequester cutting into Head Start funding, but that might not be such a bad idea. An extensive new study shows that students who went through a Head Start have poorer math scores than students who didn’t.
And what crazy right wing organization funded such a study? Obama’s own Department of Health and Human Services.
Children who were in the federal Head Start program do worse in math and have more problems with social interaction by the third grade than children who were not in the program, according to a large-scale study by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
The congressionally mandated study evaluated 4,667 elementary students. The main conclusion is that overall, the $8 billion Head Start program provides no measurable benefit for children by the time they reach the third grade compared to the sampling of children in similar economic circumstances who were not in the program, referred to as the “control group” in the study.
“In summary, there were initial positive impacts from having access to Head Start, but by the end of 3rd grade there were very few impacts found for either cohort in any of the four domains of cognitive, social-emotional, health and parenting practices,” the HHS study said. “The few impacts that were found did not show a clear pattern of favorable or unfavorable impact on children.”
I know I keep saying this, but the sequester doesn’t actually cut anything. There are no budget cuts. We’re talking about a decrease in the rate of future spending increases, but future spending still grows.
Even with the sequester, Head Start should still have more funding next year than it did this year. If, somehow, that kills the Head Start program. Good riddance!