Lois Lerner’s story keeps on unravelling.
The IRS filing in federal Judge Emmet Sullivan’s court reveals shocking new information. The IRS destroyed Lerner’s Blackberry AFTER it knew her computer had crashed and after a Congressional inquiry was well underway. As an IRS official declared under the penalty of perjury, the destroyed Blackberry would have contained the same emails (both sent and received) as Lois Lerner’s hard drive.
We all know by now that Lois Lerner’s hard drive crashed in June 2011 and was destroyed by IRS. The emails of up to twenty other related IRS officials were missing in remarkably similar “crashes,” leading many to speculate that Lois Lerner’s Blackberry perhaps held the key. Now, the Observer can confirm that a year after the infamous hard drive crash, the IRS destroyed Ms. Lerner’s Blackberry—and without making any effort to retain the emails from it.
Judge Sullivan has had to pry information from the IRS to learn anything about Ms. Lerner’s Blackberry. Now, with these latest revelations, I’m confident he’s not finished.
If we had anything but a bunch of corrupt cronies in the Justice Department, Lois Lerner would already be behind bars.
There are so many angles to the mess in Ferguson, MO, it’s difficult to know where to begin. Over at the Federalist, Robert Tracisnki has done the best job of analyzing the entire picture that I have seen anywhere. I want to share some of it here, but please go read the whole thing for yourself.
First he starts by analyzing the role police have played in kindling the fire that exploded in Ferguson:
In the face of rising crime, and with a lack of connection to the people they’re policing, the cops see themselves as the “thin blue line” separating decent people from anarchy. The over-militarization of the police, which many people have complained about after seeing photos of suburban cops in full battle rattle, is just a symptom. The underlying problem is that the police feel like occupiers trying to suppress a native insurgency.
Law and order is an enormous value, and if you provide it to people, they will appreciate it. But law and order in a free society has to be based on earning the trust of the public.
He tackles the race hustlers:
That’s why we cringe when we see the usual race-baiters like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton descend on Ferguson. They’re there to inflame the situation and take advantage of the resentment of the locals to boost their own reputations and political power.
He examines the motivations for rioting:
You don’t keep rioting because you want justice, certainly not when you’ve already brought the case to everyone’s attention and gained the nation’s sympathy. No, you riot because you feel that all authority has been knocked down, that the whole system is rotten and that there is nothing to stop you from smashing everything and taking whatever you want.
He points out that everything the rioters thought they knew has changed, and none of them paid any attention:
In fact, as I predicted, most of the facts everyone supposedly knew within the first 24 hours of the shooting of Michael Brown have been significantly revised. For example, it turns out that Brown was not an angelic aspiring college student, but a criminal. And not a sympathetic petty criminal but a thug caught on tape earlier that day committing a strong-arm robbery against a convenience store clerk. (Those who call this “shoplifting” are ignorant of legal definitions. This was strong-arm robbery in the most literal sense, as you can see from the surveillance footage of Brown grabbing a guy half his size and shoving him around.) This is relevant because it lends some plausibility to the idea that Brown might have later initiated a conflict with a police officer.
Of course, this doesn’t exonerate the cop:
No, none of this creates a presumption in favor of the officer, but it undermines the presumption in favor of Brown. There’s good reason to be skeptical of everyone, and we’re going to have to wait a good while longer before we can get a systematic and impartial accounting of all the relevant facts in court.
The world is watching, and the worst people in the world are applauding:
Every bad actor in the world—people who routinely jail reporters, beat protesters, shut down newspapers, behead people, and kill their own citizens by the trainload—every damn one of them starts to lecture us about how bad we are. To date, in ascending order of evil, we’ve heard an earful about Ferguson from the Russians and the military junta in Egypt, Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei, and the lovely gentlemen of ISIS.
The rioting doesn’t solve problems. It destroys communities that were already struggling:
How much luck do you think the Ferguson Chamber of Commerce is going to have for the next ten years? Ferguson was already under-banked, with more check-cashing outfits and sketchy payday lenders than regular bank branches. How many people are going to be eager to open up new shops along West Florissant Avenue, the epicenter of the riots?
How soon are they going to rebuild the QuikTrip? The most poignant part of that story is the conscientious young man who decided to come to work that day, despite the air of menace in the town, because he “he loves his job”—and barely escaped with his life when the store was looted and burned. Will he have any job to return to? In the first go-around, in the 60s and 70s, the answer was frequently, “no.”
That’s the real crime of the rioters. In an attempt to force the authorities to meet their demands, they’re engaging in the self-immolation of their own community. Then again, there are always those who would rather rule in hell than be just another law-abiding sucker in heaven.
Look, I wish I could just repost this whole article. I’ve probably already quoted a little too much. It really is fantastic analysis. Please go read the whole thing. It really will be worth your time.
There are probably some things in there you won’t agree with. I don’t agree with every single point. But that’s the nature of what we’re dealing with in Ferguson: a ten-headed monster. I have not found any other article that is willing to analyze the situation so transparently and honestly.
As we have said from day 1: we must stay principled in our response to controversy. It does no go to pick a side and cheer for your team. We must hold all sides accountable. We must challenge the wrongs on both sides.
Huge kudos to Robert Tracisnki and the Federalist for publishing such terrific analysis of such a messy, messy issue.
Just in case you were wondering about the White House’s priorities.
The White House sent no representation to the memorial mass for journalist James Foley who was beheaded by the ISIS terrorist group but sent three officials to the funeral for Michael Brown, the young man from Ferguson MO who robbed a convenience store and was later killed in a confrontation with a police officer.
President Barack Obama sent no White House representative to the memorial Mass held yesterday in Rochester, New Hampshire, for James Foley, the American journalist beheaded by the Islamic State in Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) terrorists.
President Obama, however, did send three White House aides to Monday’s funeral for Michael Brown, an 18-year-old African American fatally shot in an encounter with a white police officer in Ferguson, Mo.
The memorial mass for James Foley took place Sunday at Our Lady of the Holy Rosary in Foley’s hometown. Connie Hammond, an administrative assistant at Holy Rosary, told CNSNews.com that no White House officials were in attendance.
What a disgrace.
You may remember that President Obama also sent no White House representation to the funeral for former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
We spend a lot of time talking about police brutality and abuse of power around here because that’s an important topic. Police officers have in large part lost the respect of the public because they have resorted to using force and fear instead of earning the respect.
We wanted to highlight examples of police officers earning their respect. Over the coming months, we’ll be featuring stories like this one with a common theme: what a good cop looks like.
A Fort Myers, Florida police officer went above and beyond the call of duty to help a wheelchair bound man stranded in a pounding rain storm, and it was all caught on a dashboard camera.
Officer Gil Benitez works the night beat. On Thursday night around 8:30 p.m. he received an unusual call of a man in a wheelchair stuck in the rain.
"It was raining so hard, I couldn’t even see the stop sign" said Benitez.
He found Michael Arnold sitting in his electric wheel chair on the side of the road.
"The wind picked up like crazy" said Arnold. "I got to the end of the street and everything just stopped on me."
Arnold was just a block away from his home.
Within seconds of Benitez arriving to help Arnold, lightning struck near the two.
Even after that close call, Benitez pushed Arnold all the way home. He dried him off and stayed with him until Arnold’s family arrived.
Police officers are supposed to be ordinary citizens who the public hire to serve and protect their community. They are not above the law. They are not beneath it. They are co-equals with their fellow citizens under the law.
This officer is to be commended for going above and beyond what is expected of him in order to serve and protect a member of his community. Actions like these earn the respect of his community.
Emails don’t just disappear in a puff of smoke when a hard drive crashes. That’s not how the internet works. It’s how the Obama administration wants you to the think the internet works, but that’s not how the internet actually works.
Now, the Justice Department is admitting just that.
from National Review:
A Justice Department official admitted that former IRS official Lois Lerner’s apparently missing e-mails actually exist on a backup server, but the government doesn’t plan to retrieve them.
“A Department of Justice attorney told a Judicial Watch attorney on Friday that it turns out the federal government backs up all computer records in case something terrible happens in Washington and there’s a catastrophe, so the government can continue operating,” Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton told Fox News’s Shannon Bream.
“But it would be too hard to go get Lois Lerner’s e-mails from that backup system,” Fitton continued, paraphrasing the DOJ official. “So, everything we’ve been hearing about scratched hard drives, about missing e-mails of Lois Lerner, other IRS officials, other officials in the Obama administration, it’s all been a pack of malarkey. They could get these records, but they don’t want to.”
Americans can be thankful to Judicial Watch for the tireless efforts they have made towards holding the government accountable. At some point, we will get to the bottom of the IRS targeting of Conservative groups, and we will hold those responsible accountable.
Another day, another instance of police brutality caught on video.
This one comes from inside a Warmart in Greenville, SC. The video shows a man sitting on the ground before two police officers jump on top of him. One officer holds him down while the other officer punches him in the head repeatedly.
Witnesses can be heard on the video pleading with the officers to stop beating the man. The beatings continue until a third officer jumps into the fray and cuffs the man.
Here’s the video (Warning: disturbing content):
An arrest Saturday led to some witnesses thinking the arresting officers went a little far.
In a video sent to 7 On Your Side, you can see a man lying on the floor of the Walmart on Whitehorse Road and the deputies attempting to arrest him. Witnesses from the scene felt the officer’s actions went too far, but the Greenville County Sheriff’s Office is investigating the incident.
According to Greenville County Master Deputy Jonathan Smith, deputies responded around 1:00pm Saturday to a call about an intoxicated man outside the Walmart.
He said the first deputy arrived to find the man acting erratic outside the store. The deputy approached the man and tried to speak to him. The man apparently kept repeating “I’m 911” to the deputy before walking away inside the store.
Smith said the second deputy arrived and the decision was made to enter the store and arrest the man. He says the man was resisting enough that a deputy had to use a taser in order to arrest him.
Smith said the man was taken outside the store and transported to a Greenville hospital. Smith said the man is undergoing evaluation to determine if he was under the influence of alcohol or other substances.
All of the reports indicate that this man was behaving as though he were either drunk or high, but that is no excuse for the kind of behavior the police officers exhibited in this video. There is never any reason for a police officer to hold a man down while his follow officer beats him to a pulp.
As you can see in the video, there were at least three officers present at the scene. They had the man outmatched and outmuscled. The man was unarmed. Their lives were not in danger. Still, they chose to place this man’s life at risk by repeatedly beating him in the head.
As always, we want to make clear that the authors of this website are notanti-cop. We are pro-accountability for all public officials, including police officers. Police officers have a giant amount of power and authority, and that authority must come with a heavy dose of accountability.
These officers deserves to lose their badges for the way they beat this man.
From GWPF.org (H/T: The DC):
Researcher Jennifer Marohasy claims the adjusted records resemble “propaganda” rather than science.
Dr Marohasy has analysed the raw data from dozens of locations across Australia and matched it against the new data used by BOM showing that temperatures were progressively warming.
In many cases, Dr Marohasy said, temperature trends had changed from slight cooling to dramatic warming over 100 years.
BOM has rejected Dr Marohasy’s claims and said the agency had used world’s best practice and a peer reviewed process to modify the physical temperature records that had been recorded at weather stations across the country.
It said data from a selection of weather stations underwent a process known as “homogenisation” to correct for anomalies. It was “very unlikely” that data homogenisation impacted on the empirical outlooks.
In a statement to The Weekend Australian BOM said the bulk of the scientific literature did not support the view that data homogenisation resulted in “diminished physical veracity in any particular climate data set’’.
Historical data was homogenised to account for a wide range of non-climate related influences such as the type of instrument used, choice of calibration or enclosure and where it was located.
We at Poor Richard’s News have tried our best to abstain from making dangerous claims and predictions regarding global warming. We have reported that the debate has ceased to be based on unbiased science because it’s the truth. We have reported that the Earth hasn’t heated in 18 years because it hasn’t heated in 18 years. We have asserted, without reservation, that the science isn’t “settled” as so many would have you believe. We have noted where climate scientists have been terribly wrong and have encouraged our readers to continue to be skeptical of anyone who wants to use massive government regulations to solve anything — including global warming. We have made you aware that the loudest alarmist voices inevitably belong to those who have the most to gain, as it relates to money and power. We have pointed out the “weather isn’t climate” hypocrisy and we have mocked the Chicken Littles who are wrong over and over again.
But none of these things mean, definitively, that man-made global warming isn’t a real possibility. It just means we’re skeptical of it for good reason.
But I do wonder why alarmist scientists continue to manipulate data. If it’s real, show us. If it isn’t, leave us alone.
The mainstream media continues to breathlessly parrot Hamas’s propaganda about Israel targeting civilians, despite the fact that Hamas routinely uses civilians as human shields. However, with the news a 4-year-old Israeli boy’s death at the hands of Hamas, the media is totally silent.
from Arutz Sheva:
Four year-old Daniel Tragerman, hy”d, the victim of Friday’s mortar fire on Kibbutz Nahal Oz, was laid to rest Sunday morning at the Hevel Shalom cemetery in the Eshkol Region.
Daniel’s mother Gila eulogized him.
"I do not understand what’s going on at all, sweetie," Gila stated. "I cannot believe I’m here to say goodbye."
"We were the happiest family in the world and I do not accept this," she added. "My Daniel, we want to thank you for teaching us to love, to smile, and for giving us many moments of joy in such a short time. You’re smart, sensitive, beautiful."
"I find comfort in that you were a child who was loved, and who was happy, until his last moments," she continued. "We wanted to protect you, but even the ‘code red’ siren did not protect us."
"God in heaven, strengthen us, give us the strength to continue," she concluded. "We left you your Spiderman costume you loved so much […] we don’t want to say goodbye."
President Reuven Rivlin also spoke at the funeral, and carried Daniel’s casket.
"[Daniel] has paid the price of living in Israel in blood," Rivlin stated, addressing Daniel’s parents. "No one has the right to require you to stay here, but we assure you that you are not alone."
Daniel was reportedly at home when the shell was fired Friday, directly hitting a car that was parked near the home. Unfortunately, Daniel did not have enough time to reach a secure area and was hit by shrapnel.
Let’s check the major news sources in the US to see if they are covering the story.
New York Times?
Crickets from the mainstream media. And why? Because a dead Israeli four year old doesn’t fit their narrative of Israel being an oppressor.
We reported a few months ago that the TSA was allowing illegal aliens to fly on commercial airliners without a valid photo ID. There was some controversy following this story as the TSA spokesperson flatly denied the accusation on Twitter.
The truth is now out: the story was correct all along, and the TSA lied to cover it up.
A new letter from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) admits that illegal aliens were being allowed to board planes using Notice to Appear forms received after entering the U.S. illegally. The revelation directly contradicts a TSA statement last month denying such allegations to various media outlets, including Breitbart News. In July Breitbart Texas Managing Director Brandon Darby broke the news that the TSA was letting illegal aliens board planes using Notice to Appear forms; subsequently, a TSA spokesperson publicly attacked Darby on Twitter, insisting that his report was “completely wrong.”
The newly-surfaced TSA letter was penned on August 7, according to the Gateway Pundit. It was reportedly sent from the TSA to Rep. Kenny Marchant (R-TX), a member of the Border Security Caucus. The letter confirms that illegal aliens are being allowed to board planes using a Notice to Appear form (also known as I-862), as Darby revealed in July.
Hector Garza, a spokesman for the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) told Darby that Notice to Appear forms can “easily be reproduced or manipulated on any home computer. The Notice to Appear form has no photo, anyone can make one and manipulate one. They do not have any security features, no watermark, nothing. They are simply printed on standard copy paper based on the information the illegal alien says is the truth.”
This is yet another case of the Obama administration violating their own laws and regulations and lying to the American people to cover it up.
Here’s the deal:
I love bacon.
If anyone is offended by that statement, I simply do not care.
Apparently, that’s not the way things work in Vermont.
A sign on a lamp post at the bottom of the Winooski Circle displayed the words “Yield Sneakers Bacon” until Friday morning. The bistro owners took it down.
It got there as part of “Operation Bloom.”
A city program put it in place to keep its flower beds beautiful. If businesses do some gardening they can post an advertisement where they do it, but the word “bacon” on the Sneakers Bistro sign started a discussion about diversity on the Winooski Front Porch Forum.
It started with a post from one woman who wrote that the sign was insensitive to those who do not consume pork. She said as a Muslim she is personally offended by it.
The owners of Sneakers spoke to WPTZ. They say they’ve reached out to the individual who made the post and proactively took the sign down. They also say they regret any harm caused by the sign, and that their goal was never to cause stress or bad feelings.
At least this was all voluntary. If this business owner wants to be a total wimp and cave to intolerant bullying, that’s fine. However, the whole ordeal is frustrating to watch from afar.
Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to go eat some delicious, delicious bacon….which is a kind of pork…which is made from a pig…a dead pig….a delicious dead pig.
This is an excellent side-by-side comparison of the best kind of personal character next to the worst kind of race-hustler.
Carson, as usual, is articulate, respectful, and well thought out while Jackson simply tries to stir the pot and provoke racial animosity.
here’s the video:
Notice Jackson cites Rosa Parks as if she were a parallel to Michael Brown. Nothing could be further from the truth. Rosa Parks’s crime was that she sat on a bus. Michael Brown robbed a QuikTrip.
The fact of the matters is that we still don’t know the facts of the matter surrounding the death of Michael Brown. There is no evidence whatsoever that the police officer shot Michael Brown in cold blood. If that evidence should surface, the police officer should be charged with murder; but that evidence is nowhere to be found at this point. He is innocent until proven guilty, but race hustlers like Jesse Jackson want to try him in the court of public opinion and treat him as though he were guilty until proven innocent.
This has been our refrain from the beginning of the Ferguson controversy: stick to the facts. Stay principled. Don’t get sucked into the media hype or the race-baiting narrative.