With the shooting death of Michael Brown, the subject of race has been a hot topic in America lately. We hear daily about “white privilege” and how racist white Americans are. But a few stories recently paint a slightly different picture of racism. Yes, racism exists, but not always in the way the left describes it.
From the DC:
The family of a white man who was assaulted on Aug. 21 believe that he was a victim of a hate crime, CBS Baltimore reports.
The unnamed 25-year-old victim was walking home from his lifeguarding job in the Otterbein neighborhood of Baltimore when he was allegedly attacked by three black teens.
According to The Baltimore Sun, the teens shouted “Hey white boy” and “What you got?” at the victim. A rock was thrown at the victim’s face, and according to police, one of the teens tried to stab him with a pocket knife. The victim dodged the knife.
The teen suspected of the attempted stabbing, identified as 19-year-old Sidney Joyner, was arrested and currently faces charges of armed robbery, robbery and two counts of assault.
But the victim’s father, who also is unidentified, thinks that Joyner should have been charged with a hate crime, citing the “Hey white boy” line.
“If roles were reversed, it definitely would be no question whether it was a hate crime or not,” the father told CBS Baltimore.
The father is exactly right. Don’t get me wrong, the entire notion of “hate crimes” is ridiculous. But if this doesn’t fit the definition of one, I don’t know what does.
We’ve written before about how ludicrous “hate crime” legislation is.
Let me state, for the record, that I believe the entire idea of so-called “hate crimes”, specifically, is ludicrous. A crime is a crime. End of story. A person’s motive for committing that crime is irrelevant and should have no bearing on the punishment given (with the obvious exception of having lesser punishments for things like crimes of passion, etc). By having unequal punishments, it is implied that certain victims’ lives are worth more than others. This is quite the opposite of justice.
Not only this, but it gives prosecutors the broad power to determine what constitutes a “hate crime” and what doesn’t. This leaves the door wide open for abuse by officials who might have a personal bias of their own. This is unacceptable.
But if we’re going to have it, we should at least apply it fairly and consistently. But actually, if progressives were honest, they would admit the entire point of hate crime legislation is so the government has the ability to punish certain groups differently than others.
There’s a similar story out of Mississippi.
Also, from the DC:
A rural Mississippi man suffered life-threatening injuries and required brain surgery after he entered a Waffle House despite receiving a warning not to enter the restaurant because of the color of his skin.
The severe beating occurred early Sunday morning around 2 a.m., reports The Clarion-Ledger. Up to 20 assailants participated.
The injured man is Ralph Weems IV, a veteran of the Iraq War and a Marine. He is white.
The altercation began at about 1 a.m. when Weems and a friend, David Knighten, chose to go inside the Waffle House. They made this decision after a man in the parking lot diplomatically suggested that they should leave because the patrons inside were angry about the Aug. 9 police shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo. Thus, the unidentified man explained, the restaurant would not be a safe place for two white people.
Can. You. Imagine.
Seriously. Think about what the media would do if a black man had been warned not to enter a restaurant, entered anyway, and was subsequently beaten nearly to death while racial epithets were hurled at him…in Mississippi of all places. Just think about it.
The left needs to stop pretending that racism is only a one way street. It’s not. It’s about time that we put a stop to the tyranny of low expectations and begin holding everyone to the same, objective standard.
Do not the film the queen! She does not care about your Constitution and your 1st Amendment. Do not film the queen.
Here’s the video:
The queen does not care that she’s on a public sidewalk on the busiest street in town. Do not film the queen.
Do not film the queen.
This fantastic montage of lunacy from Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid really makes me wonder if there’s something to the whole dementia rumor. Half the time, I don’t think Harry Reid even knows what Harry Reid is talking about.
Here’s the video:
"I’ve been very satisfied with………me"
I bet you are, Harry Reid. I bet you are.
Lois Lerner’s story keeps on unravelling.
The IRS filing in federal Judge Emmet Sullivan’s court reveals shocking new information. The IRS destroyed Lerner’s Blackberry AFTER it knew her computer had crashed and after a Congressional inquiry was well underway. As an IRS official declared under the penalty of perjury, the destroyed Blackberry would have contained the same emails (both sent and received) as Lois Lerner’s hard drive.
We all know by now that Lois Lerner’s hard drive crashed in June 2011 and was destroyed by IRS. The emails of up to twenty other related IRS officials were missing in remarkably similar “crashes,” leading many to speculate that Lois Lerner’s Blackberry perhaps held the key. Now, the Observer can confirm that a year after the infamous hard drive crash, the IRS destroyed Ms. Lerner’s Blackberry—and without making any effort to retain the emails from it.
Judge Sullivan has had to pry information from the IRS to learn anything about Ms. Lerner’s Blackberry. Now, with these latest revelations, I’m confident he’s not finished.
If we had anything but a bunch of corrupt cronies in the Justice Department, Lois Lerner would already be behind bars.
There are so many angles to the mess in Ferguson, MO, it’s difficult to know where to begin. Over at the Federalist, Robert Tracisnki has done the best job of analyzing the entire picture that I have seen anywhere. I want to share some of it here, but please go read the whole thing for yourself.
First he starts by analyzing the role police have played in kindling the fire that exploded in Ferguson:
In the face of rising crime, and with a lack of connection to the people they’re policing, the cops see themselves as the “thin blue line” separating decent people from anarchy. The over-militarization of the police, which many people have complained about after seeing photos of suburban cops in full battle rattle, is just a symptom. The underlying problem is that the police feel like occupiers trying to suppress a native insurgency.
Law and order is an enormous value, and if you provide it to people, they will appreciate it. But law and order in a free society has to be based on earning the trust of the public.
He tackles the race hustlers:
That’s why we cringe when we see the usual race-baiters like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton descend on Ferguson. They’re there to inflame the situation and take advantage of the resentment of the locals to boost their own reputations and political power.
He examines the motivations for rioting:
You don’t keep rioting because you want justice, certainly not when you’ve already brought the case to everyone’s attention and gained the nation’s sympathy. No, you riot because you feel that all authority has been knocked down, that the whole system is rotten and that there is nothing to stop you from smashing everything and taking whatever you want.
He points out that everything the rioters thought they knew has changed, and none of them paid any attention:
In fact, as I predicted, most of the facts everyone supposedly knew within the first 24 hours of the shooting of Michael Brown have been significantly revised. For example, it turns out that Brown was not an angelic aspiring college student, but a criminal. And not a sympathetic petty criminal but a thug caught on tape earlier that day committing a strong-arm robbery against a convenience store clerk. (Those who call this “shoplifting” are ignorant of legal definitions. This was strong-arm robbery in the most literal sense, as you can see from the surveillance footage of Brown grabbing a guy half his size and shoving him around.) This is relevant because it lends some plausibility to the idea that Brown might have later initiated a conflict with a police officer.
Of course, this doesn’t exonerate the cop:
No, none of this creates a presumption in favor of the officer, but it undermines the presumption in favor of Brown. There’s good reason to be skeptical of everyone, and we’re going to have to wait a good while longer before we can get a systematic and impartial accounting of all the relevant facts in court.
The world is watching, and the worst people in the world are applauding:
Every bad actor in the world—people who routinely jail reporters, beat protesters, shut down newspapers, behead people, and kill their own citizens by the trainload—every damn one of them starts to lecture us about how bad we are. To date, in ascending order of evil, we’ve heard an earful about Ferguson from the Russians and the military junta in Egypt, Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei, and the lovely gentlemen of ISIS.
The rioting doesn’t solve problems. It destroys communities that were already struggling:
How much luck do you think the Ferguson Chamber of Commerce is going to have for the next ten years? Ferguson was already under-banked, with more check-cashing outfits and sketchy payday lenders than regular bank branches. How many people are going to be eager to open up new shops along West Florissant Avenue, the epicenter of the riots?
How soon are they going to rebuild the QuikTrip? The most poignant part of that story is the conscientious young man who decided to come to work that day, despite the air of menace in the town, because he “he loves his job”—and barely escaped with his life when the store was looted and burned. Will he have any job to return to? In the first go-around, in the 60s and 70s, the answer was frequently, “no.”
That’s the real crime of the rioters. In an attempt to force the authorities to meet their demands, they’re engaging in the self-immolation of their own community. Then again, there are always those who would rather rule in hell than be just another law-abiding sucker in heaven.
Look, I wish I could just repost this whole article. I’ve probably already quoted a little too much. It really is fantastic analysis. Please go read the whole thing. It really will be worth your time.
There are probably some things in there you won’t agree with. I don’t agree with every single point. But that’s the nature of what we’re dealing with in Ferguson: a ten-headed monster. I have not found any other article that is willing to analyze the situation so transparently and honestly.
As we have said from day 1: we must stay principled in our response to controversy. It does no go to pick a side and cheer for your team. We must hold all sides accountable. We must challenge the wrongs on both sides.
Huge kudos to Robert Tracisnki and the Federalist for publishing such terrific analysis of such a messy, messy issue.
Just in case you were wondering about the White House’s priorities.
The White House sent no representation to the memorial mass for journalist James Foley who was beheaded by the ISIS terrorist group but sent three officials to the funeral for Michael Brown, the young man from Ferguson MO who robbed a convenience store and was later killed in a confrontation with a police officer.
President Barack Obama sent no White House representative to the memorial Mass held yesterday in Rochester, New Hampshire, for James Foley, the American journalist beheaded by the Islamic State in Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) terrorists.
President Obama, however, did send three White House aides to Monday’s funeral for Michael Brown, an 18-year-old African American fatally shot in an encounter with a white police officer in Ferguson, Mo.
The memorial mass for James Foley took place Sunday at Our Lady of the Holy Rosary in Foley’s hometown. Connie Hammond, an administrative assistant at Holy Rosary, told CNSNews.com that no White House officials were in attendance.
What a disgrace.
You may remember that President Obama also sent no White House representation to the funeral for former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
We spend a lot of time talking about police brutality and abuse of power around here because that’s an important topic. Police officers have in large part lost the respect of the public because they have resorted to using force and fear instead of earning the respect.
We wanted to highlight examples of police officers earning their respect. Over the coming months, we’ll be featuring stories like this one with a common theme: what a good cop looks like.
A Fort Myers, Florida police officer went above and beyond the call of duty to help a wheelchair bound man stranded in a pounding rain storm, and it was all caught on a dashboard camera.
Officer Gil Benitez works the night beat. On Thursday night around 8:30 p.m. he received an unusual call of a man in a wheelchair stuck in the rain.
"It was raining so hard, I couldn’t even see the stop sign" said Benitez.
He found Michael Arnold sitting in his electric wheel chair on the side of the road.
"The wind picked up like crazy" said Arnold. "I got to the end of the street and everything just stopped on me."
Arnold was just a block away from his home.
Within seconds of Benitez arriving to help Arnold, lightning struck near the two.
Even after that close call, Benitez pushed Arnold all the way home. He dried him off and stayed with him until Arnold’s family arrived.
Police officers are supposed to be ordinary citizens who the public hire to serve and protect their community. They are not above the law. They are not beneath it. They are co-equals with their fellow citizens under the law.
This officer is to be commended for going above and beyond what is expected of him in order to serve and protect a member of his community. Actions like these earn the respect of his community.
Emails don’t just disappear in a puff of smoke when a hard drive crashes. That’s not how the internet works. It’s how the Obama administration wants you to the think the internet works, but that’s not how the internet actually works.
Now, the Justice Department is admitting just that.
from National Review:
A Justice Department official admitted that former IRS official Lois Lerner’s apparently missing e-mails actually exist on a backup server, but the government doesn’t plan to retrieve them.
“A Department of Justice attorney told a Judicial Watch attorney on Friday that it turns out the federal government backs up all computer records in case something terrible happens in Washington and there’s a catastrophe, so the government can continue operating,” Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton told Fox News’s Shannon Bream.
“But it would be too hard to go get Lois Lerner’s e-mails from that backup system,” Fitton continued, paraphrasing the DOJ official. “So, everything we’ve been hearing about scratched hard drives, about missing e-mails of Lois Lerner, other IRS officials, other officials in the Obama administration, it’s all been a pack of malarkey. They could get these records, but they don’t want to.”
Americans can be thankful to Judicial Watch for the tireless efforts they have made towards holding the government accountable. At some point, we will get to the bottom of the IRS targeting of Conservative groups, and we will hold those responsible accountable.
Another day, another instance of police brutality caught on video.
This one comes from inside a Warmart in Greenville, SC. The video shows a man sitting on the ground before two police officers jump on top of him. One officer holds him down while the other officer punches him in the head repeatedly.
Witnesses can be heard on the video pleading with the officers to stop beating the man. The beatings continue until a third officer jumps into the fray and cuffs the man.
Here’s the video (Warning: disturbing content):
An arrest Saturday led to some witnesses thinking the arresting officers went a little far.
In a video sent to 7 On Your Side, you can see a man lying on the floor of the Walmart on Whitehorse Road and the deputies attempting to arrest him. Witnesses from the scene felt the officer’s actions went too far, but the Greenville County Sheriff’s Office is investigating the incident.
According to Greenville County Master Deputy Jonathan Smith, deputies responded around 1:00pm Saturday to a call about an intoxicated man outside the Walmart.
He said the first deputy arrived to find the man acting erratic outside the store. The deputy approached the man and tried to speak to him. The man apparently kept repeating “I’m 911” to the deputy before walking away inside the store.
Smith said the second deputy arrived and the decision was made to enter the store and arrest the man. He says the man was resisting enough that a deputy had to use a taser in order to arrest him.
Smith said the man was taken outside the store and transported to a Greenville hospital. Smith said the man is undergoing evaluation to determine if he was under the influence of alcohol or other substances.
All of the reports indicate that this man was behaving as though he were either drunk or high, but that is no excuse for the kind of behavior the police officers exhibited in this video. There is never any reason for a police officer to hold a man down while his follow officer beats him to a pulp.
As you can see in the video, there were at least three officers present at the scene. They had the man outmatched and outmuscled. The man was unarmed. Their lives were not in danger. Still, they chose to place this man’s life at risk by repeatedly beating him in the head.
As always, we want to make clear that the authors of this website are notanti-cop. We are pro-accountability for all public officials, including police officers. Police officers have a giant amount of power and authority, and that authority must come with a heavy dose of accountability.
These officers deserves to lose their badges for the way they beat this man.
From GWPF.org (H/T: The DC):
Researcher Jennifer Marohasy claims the adjusted records resemble “propaganda” rather than science.
Dr Marohasy has analysed the raw data from dozens of locations across Australia and matched it against the new data used by BOM showing that temperatures were progressively warming.
In many cases, Dr Marohasy said, temperature trends had changed from slight cooling to dramatic warming over 100 years.
BOM has rejected Dr Marohasy’s claims and said the agency had used world’s best practice and a peer reviewed process to modify the physical temperature records that had been recorded at weather stations across the country.
It said data from a selection of weather stations underwent a process known as “homogenisation” to correct for anomalies. It was “very unlikely” that data homogenisation impacted on the empirical outlooks.
In a statement to The Weekend Australian BOM said the bulk of the scientific literature did not support the view that data homogenisation resulted in “diminished physical veracity in any particular climate data set’’.
Historical data was homogenised to account for a wide range of non-climate related influences such as the type of instrument used, choice of calibration or enclosure and where it was located.
We at Poor Richard’s News have tried our best to abstain from making dangerous claims and predictions regarding global warming. We have reported that the debate has ceased to be based on unbiased science because it’s the truth. We have reported that the Earth hasn’t heated in 18 years because it hasn’t heated in 18 years. We have asserted, without reservation, that the science isn’t “settled” as so many would have you believe. We have noted where climate scientists have been terribly wrong and have encouraged our readers to continue to be skeptical of anyone who wants to use massive government regulations to solve anything — including global warming. We have made you aware that the loudest alarmist voices inevitably belong to those who have the most to gain, as it relates to money and power. We have pointed out the “weather isn’t climate” hypocrisy and we have mocked the Chicken Littles who are wrong over and over again.
But none of these things mean, definitively, that man-made global warming isn’t a real possibility. It just means we’re skeptical of it for good reason.
But I do wonder why alarmist scientists continue to manipulate data. If it’s real, show us. If it isn’t, leave us alone.