NPR: People should stop having kids because of Global WarmingTM

In Climate Change, Politics by Mr. RightLeave a Comment

Dumbest piece ever?

From NPR:

Standing before several dozen students in a college classroom, Travis Rieder tries to convince them not to have children. Or at least not too many.

He’s at James Madison University in southwest Virginia to talk about a “small-family ethic” — to question the assumptions of a society that sees having children as good, throws parties for expecting parents, and in which parents then pressure their kids to “give them grandchildren.”

Why question such assumptions? The prospect of climate catastrophe.

For years, people have lamented how bad things might get “for our grandchildren,” but Rieder tells the students that future isn’t so far off anymore.

He asks how old they will be in 2036, and, if they are thinking of having kids, how old their kids will be.

“Dangerous climate change is going to be happening by then,” he says. “Very, very soon.”

Read the Rest (Don’t do it)

It’s not about so-called climate change, folks. If it were, the left would all become vegetarians and stop flying on airplanes. They would also support nuclear power and fracking for natural gas, both of which yield cleaner energy than traditional crude oil, as well as being cheaper and more efficient. It’s about the narrative.

Here’s a portion of a rebuttal from the NRO:

It’s hard to know what’s more shocking and depressing—that there are large numbers of people out there who take nonsense like this seriously or that our government-funded radio network has reporters credulous enough to report on it without a trace of mockery.

…The article informs us that “scientists and world leaders agree” that a change of over two degrees Celsius ”would trigger cataclysmic consequences” (scientists are agreed on no such thing, and not having crystal balls, it wouldn’t matter if they did agree—they simply can’t know).

One of the stars of the NPR article, Travis Rieder, a bioethicist at Johns Hopkins with one child, claims to know about ethics, but he clearly knows nothing about history, which, at least in the developed world, has been rife with failed predictions of environmental doom and a continued under-estimation of human resiliency (a finding extensively documented 35 years ago by economist Julian Simon and built on by countless scholars since).

Read the Rest (Do it)

Again, it’s not about climate change. This about controlling the population and ending the free market. More simply put, it’s about control. And they don’t even try to hide it any more.